Saturday, September 04, 2010
   
Text Size

Green Bin Project could define our mayor

LONDON (Jan. 13) – There are probably about five million reasons why city council’s environment and transportation committee voted 4-2 this week to delay a decision on a Green Bin program for London until after this fall’s election. No one should be surprised.

Five million dollars is the expected annual cost for full implementation of the Green Bin, which would recycle so-called ‘wet’ waste such as fruit and vegetable peelings, table scraps and disposable diapers. What was on the table Monday night was a pilot project to work out the kinks. It would service 750 homes and cost about $100,000.

However, as Ward 14 councillor Cheryl Miller accurately observed, once a pilot project has been successful it is very difficult to stop the full runout. And the four committee members who voted to delay – besides Mrs. Miller they were Controller Bud Polhill and councillors Roger Caranci (Ward 1) and Paul Van Meerbergen (Ward 10). No surprise there.

Voting in favour of the pilot project were Nancy Branscombe (Ward 5) and Paul Hubert (Ward 8). No surprised there, either.

Now it’s up to the full council to decide, this Monday, whether London should start getting on side with this worthwhile program this coming year or wait and let a new group decide next year. Does this group want a legacy as progressively committed to doing all it can to protect and preserve the environment, or a legacy as waiters?

The $100,000 cost wouldn’t put much of a squeeze on this year’s budget. Finding $5 million next year could certainly cause the new council some concern. But on the other hand, if each council worried what the next one might do or how it might do it, nothing would ever get done.

The Green Bin program should be installed because it is the right thing to do. Recycling material into something to be used again is always preferable to stuffing it into a landfill that is slowly but surely filling up.

Are the votes there to do it? A good question, one that might well come down to a deciding vote by Mayor Anne Marie DeCicco-Best. And why not? Our mayor wants a fourth term. It’s time for her to decide, with everything on the line, whether she wants to lead this council somewhere important – or be a waiter.

 

Comments  

 
0 #1 producertom hard 2010-01-13 05:08
I have now book-marked the Mcleod Report and this shall be my news-paper. i think marie outa steps aside and let a product that has not been spawned from archaic catholic roots act as a town mayor! sorry for my 'nail-on-the-head' comment.

Next election, I will be involved in some important way but I am not telling you anymore.

I see a big future for London, yes a green London, so the boxes are in!
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Subscribe to My Email List

Name:
Email:

Picture of the Day

Local Weather

61°
16°
°F | °C
Partly Cloudy
Humidity: 63%
Sat

48 | 62
8 | 16
Sun

57 | 69
13 | 20
Mon

63 | 77
17 | 25
Tue

59 | 82
15 | 27

Headlines

WEEK OF AUG. 30, 2010

Note to politicians: Don't tweet to preach
London Free Press

Bernie MacDonald to step down
London Free Press

Public sector wage freeze could lead to strikes: CAW
Toronto Star

Ontario high schools said charging 'user fees'
Toronto Star

Change coming to city council
London Free Press

Phone companies to rebate customers $90
National Post

 

Canada's place with America, Tony Blair says
The Globe & Mail

Nurses put heat on McGuinty over pay freeze
Toronto Star

Nurses

 

Follow Me On

Philip McLeod on Facebook

Philip McLeod on Twitter